Explore / Peer-reviewed article
Peer-reviewed articleOpen access

Comparison of the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Qiao D, Liu W, Xue H, Liu R, Gao Y, Dong J, Wu W, Feng JiD, Li M, Yao L

BMC anesthesiologyJul 5, 2025License: open accessChina4 citationsDOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-03211-x

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Esketamine exerts analgesic effects and has pharmacological properties of bronchodilation and elevation of mean arterial pressure, making it an interesting analgesic agent for patients with ARDS. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of esketamine/midazolam and remifentanil/midazolam on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.<h4>Methods</h4>In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, patients with ARDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil/midazolam (n = 25) or esketamine/midazolam (n = 25). Both groups maintained equivalent levels of sedation and analgesia. The primary outcomes were airway resistance (R<sub>aw</sub>) and static respiratory system compliance (C<sub>st</sub>) at 24, 48, and 72 h post-medication administration. Plateau Pressure (P<sub>plat</sub>), peak airway pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>), hemodynamic parameters, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay were also recorded.<h4>Results</h4>C<sub>st</sub> at 72 h post-medication in esketamine group (49.8 ± 13.8) was higher than that in control group (42.4 ± 11.9) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in R<sub>aw</sub> at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-medication between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 72 h post-medication, both P<sub>plat</sub> and P<sub>peak</sub> in the esketamine group [(15.6 ± 3.1); (25.7 ± 3.8)] were significantly lower than those in the control group[(17.7 ± 4.2); (28.5 ± 4.7)] (P < 0.05). Additionally, the esketamine group [(256.6 ± 89.1); (266.4 ± 88.4); (284.92 ± 84.45)] demonstrated significantly higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios compared to the control group [(208.7 ± 61.5);(219.52 ± 61.28); (222.00 ± 68.54)] at all measured time points (P < 0.05). MAP and heart rate were higher in the esketamine group than in the control group, while cumulative doses of vasoactive drugs were comparatively lower in the esketamine group. The duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay did not-differ (P > 0.05).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Esketamine/midazolam leads to improved in C<sub>st</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio compared to remifentanil/midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.<h4>Clinical trial registration</h4>This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070733) on April 21, 2023. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

Topics & conditions

Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.

Ketamine

Keywords

ARDSMechanical ventilationRespiratory mechanicsEsketamine

Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.