Explore / Peer-reviewed article
Peer-reviewed article

Serotonergic psychedelics and amphetamine shift male rat ultrasonic vocalizations toward call patterns associated with positively valenced states.

Cyrano E, Gołębiowska J, Popik P, Zajdel P, Potasiewicz A

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatrySep 19, 2026Poland0 citationsDOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2026.111940

Abstract

Psychedelics and psychostimulants produce subjective and often positive affective effects in humans. In rats, positive affective states are often associated with frequency-modulated ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs). We examined whether the hallucinogenic 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI; 1.25-2.5 mg/kg) and LSD (0.04-0.08 mg/kg), the non-hallucinogenic lisuride (0.03 or 0.3 mg/kg) and the psychostimulant amphetamine (1 mg/kg) modulate USV emission, activity, and head-twitch response (HTR) in male Wistar rats. USVs were detected using DeepSqueak and clustered in a custom, unsupervised manner using variational autoencoder-based, and frequency-based embeddings. Behavior was analyzed using DeepLabCut and SimBA AI/machine learning tools. DOI (2.5 mg/kg) and LSD (0.08 mg/kg), but not lisuride or amphetamine induced HTR, whereas only amphetamine (1 mg/kg) increased activity. DeepSqueak detected nearly 48,000 calls, and UMAP-based k-means clustering identified four broad call categories: 22-kHz alarm and 50-kHz flat, step-up/trill, and upward-ramp-like calls. Total call emission increased after amphetamine and both DOI doses. However, cluster-based analyses indicated that the compounds did not merely increase overall calling but altered the vocal repertoire. DOI and LSD (0.04 mg/kg) reduced occupancy of the flat-call cluster, a call type typically unrelated to reward or appetitive behavior. In contrast, LSD (0.08 mg/kg), lisuride (0.03 mg/kg), and amphetamine increased occupancy of frequency-modulated clusters, call categories often associated with positive affect. Serotonergic psychedelics, lisuride, and amphetamine alter rat ultrasonic vocalizations and may shift vocal repertoires toward patterns associated with positively valenced states. USV profiles did not parallel HTR and should be viewed as a complementary affective readout rather than a substitute marker of psychedelic-like activity.

Topics & conditions

Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.

LSD

Keywords

RodentMachine LearningBehavioral PhenotypingAffective VocalizationHallucinogenic Vs Non-hallucinogenic Agonists

Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.