The Emperor's New Diagnoses: Psychedelics, Psychosis, and the Limits of Psychiatric Distinctions
Abstract
<p>Psychedelic and psychotic experiences are institutionally treated as belonging to different orders — yet in phenomenology and in cultural interpretation, they often converge. The present paper examines that gap. It sets out the similarities and differences between the two — chiefly the predominance of visual rather than auditory hallucinations in psychedelic experience, the role of insight, the influence of context in both, and the asymmetry in clinical response. It does not adjudicate the causal question of whether psychedelics can induce psychosis; the clinical, population, and naturalistic literature answer different questions, and none of them closes the case. I argue, rather, that psychosis research has much to gain from attending to features long central in psychedelic science: the significance of subjective experience and meaning-making, the influence of set and setting, and the moral commitment to impartial care. The aim is narrow — to mark what the available comparison does and does not warrant — but the implications, I suggest, bear on how psychiatry frames, studies, and responds to altered states more broadly.</p>
Topics & conditions
Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.
Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.