Peer-reviewed articleOpen access
Matters arising: Methodological concerns and interpretative limitations of assessing subjective effects of ketamine.
Abstract
The letter addresses critical issues in the methodology and conclusions of the meta-analysis, including inconsistencies in study design, methodological flaws in comparing correlation coefficients, and discrepancies in reported results and their interpretation. It contributes significantly to the ongoing discussion on psychedelic-assisted therapies and highlights the need for more standardized methodologies in future research.
Topics & conditions
Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.
Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.
Related research
ArticleMDMA
Chemsex drugs: More than ghb, mephedrone and methamphetamine?
ArticleKetamine
Midazolam-Ketamine (MK) Versus Propofol-Ketamine (PK) for Pediatric Burn Patients Undergoing Dressing Changes: A Non-Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial.
ArticleKetamine