Use of Prescribed and Non-Prescribed Treatments for Cluster Headache in a Swedish Cohort.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Cluster headache (CH) is a debilitating condition, but current therapies leave CH patients in pain. The extent of this problem in Sweden is unknown.<h4>Methods</h4>An anonymized questionnaire was sent to 479 Swedish CH patients to investigate patterns and perceived effects of treatments.<h4>Results</h4>Three hundred fourteen answers were analyzed. The population was representative regarding age of onset and sex. Less than half (46%) were satisfied with their abortive treatments, 19% terminated functioning abortive treatments due to side effects. Additionally, 17% of chronic CH patients had not tried the first-line preventive drug verapamil. A small subset had tried illicit substances to treat their CH (0-8% depending on substance). Notably, psilocybin was reported effective as an abortive treatment by 100% (<i>n</i> = 8), and with some level of effect as a preventive treatment by 92% (<i>n</i> = 12). For verapamil, some level of preventive effect was reported among 68% (<i>n</i> = 85).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our descriptive data illustrate that many Swedish CH patients are undertreated, lack functional therapies, and experience side effects. Further studies are warranted to search for new treatment strategies as well as a revision of current treatment guidelines with the aim of reducing patient disease burden to the greatest extent possible.
Topics & conditions
Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.
Keywords
Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.