Explore / Preprint
Preprint

Treatment Attrition, Concomitant Pharmaceutical Use, Temporal Claims-Based Utilization, and Real-World Characteristics Among Esketamine New Initiators in the United States, 2019-2022

Truax BG

Apr 23, 20240 citationsDOI: 10.1101/2024.04.23.24306221

Abstract

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Aims</h4> To investigate real-world treatment attrition, concomitant use of pharmaceuticals with known drug-interactions, total cost of care, claims-based outcomes, and health disparities for individuals initiated on esketamine therapy in the United States. <h4>Methods</h4> Individuals aged 18-64 with >=1 adjudicated claim for esketamine intranasal spray from 2019 to 2022 in the Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) were included. Continuous health plan enrollment was required for 6 months prior and 6 months post-esketamine start date. Medical claims, pharmacy claims data, and socioeconomic data were descriptively analyzed to investigate characteristics of the real-world esketamine cohort. <h4>Results</h4> There were 833 individuals in the esketamine analysis cohort. 33% had <8 treatment sessions and did not finish the first stage of treatment (induction phase). Use of pharmaceuticals with drug interactions was high-60.2% had at least one prescription fill for a drug with a known esketamine interaction in the 90-day window after esketamine initiation. Total costs of care went from $2,905 per patient per month (PPPM) in the baseline period to $5,734 PPPM in the follow-up period. Emergency department utilization with mental-health related diagnoses reduced by 42.5% in the follow-up period. PPPM utilization for office visits, excluding all claims on esketamine treatment days, went up 45% in the follow-up period. The esketamine cohort was pharmaceutically complex, and many of them had fractured care: 20% had prescription fills for >=11 drugs in the follow-up period. 18.6% percent of the cohort had >=7 drug-prescribing providers, and over 35% of the cohort had encounters with more than 10 healthcare practitioners in the follow-up period. The esketamine cohort had 26.6% more individuals in the highest socioeconomic status quintile (least socially deprived), compared to individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), not initiated on esketamine. <h4>Limitations</h4> This was a retrospective cohort descriptive analysis with small sample sizes. Additional statistical analysis was not performed. <h4>Conclusions</h4> The esketamine cohort was characterized by considerable complexity from both a polypharmacy and lifestyle perspective. These contextual factors likely had significant bearing on adoption, access, and eventual claims-based outcomes. Understanding the interplay of these factors with the treatment dynamics of consciousness-altering compounds will be important to obtain the best real-world results from therapeutic classes with psychedelic compounds.

Topics & conditions

Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.

KetamineDepression

Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.