Urinary false-positive ecstasy screening by Mebeverine Metabolite: a confirmatory study and controlled administration.
Abstract
Urinary immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) are first-line tools for psychoactive substance screening in clinical and forensic settings. Their limited specificity, however, predisposes them to cross-reactive interferences generating false-positive results.We report three consecutive cases of false-positive 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) results on rapid urinary ICT screening attributable to therapeutic mebeverine use, all confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Three patients admitted to emergency and intensive care units were all receiving mebeverine therapeutically.A 12-panel ICT (MDMA cut-off: 500 ng/mL) returned presumptive positive MDMA results in all three specimens. GC-MS confirmatory analysis detected neither MDMA nor its primary metabolite, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA). Mebeverine O-desmethyl-butanol was consistently identified in all three specimens. A spiking experiment with certified mebeverine hydrochloride at 3000 ng/mL yielded a negative ICT result, excluding the parent compound as the causative agent. A controlled single-dose administration experiment (200 mg oral mebeverine) produced positive MDMA ICT results in all four urine specimens collected between 4 and 13 hours post-ingestion; GC-MS confirmed mebeverine O-desmethyl-butanol as the sole mebeverine-derived compound identified, strongly implicating this metabolite in the observed cross-reactivity.Any positive MDMA immunochromatographic result in a patient receiving mebeverine must be confirmed by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS. Mebeverine and its metabolites should be incorporated into cross-reactivity documentation by ICT manufacturers.
Topics & conditions
Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.
Keywords
Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.