Explore / Peer-reviewed article
Peer-reviewed articleOpen access

Comparative Efficacy of Esketamine vs Sufentanil with Propofol for Sedation in EUS: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

Liu CiD, Wang Y, Yin Y, Wang P, Ji X, Sun J, Zhao S, Jia Y, Liu S, Zhou Z

Journal of pain researchJan 15, 2025License: open accessChina4 citationsDOI: 10.2147/jpr.s498499

Abstract

<h4>Purpose</h4>This randomized, controlled trial aimed to assess the sedative effects of esketamine and sufentanil combined with propofol during EUS.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Three hundred and forty patients undergone EUS were randomly divided into two groups to receive esketamine 0.25 mg/kg combined with propofol (esketamine group) or sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg combined with propofol (sufentanil group). The primary outcome measure was respiratory depression incidence. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of body movements, propofol dosage, lowest SPO<sub>2</sub> during the operation, and management of airway obstruction. In addition, other procedures and anesthesia-related outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 340 patients underwent randomization. Of these, 172 were assigned to the esketamine group and 168 were assigned to the sufentanil group. 1 patient in the esketamine group was lost in the follow-up. During the EUS, 9 patients (5.3%) in the esketamine group and 26 (15.5%) in the sufentanil group developed respiratory depression; this difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Regarding secondary outcomes, the incidence of body movements, induction dosage, supplemental times, and total dosage of propofol were much higher in the sufentanil group than in the esketamine group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, the lowest SPO<sub>2</sub> during the operation, occurrence rate of airway intervention, and management of airway obstruction were significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Compared to the sufentanil group, the induction time of sedation in the esketamine group was shorter, and the hemodynamics were more stable (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in the PACU incidence rates of nausea or vomiting between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas the following day's complications showed no statistical difference.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Esketamine combined with propofol for sedation during EUS can decrease respiratory depression, reduce the dosage of propofol and PONV, and provide a more stable hemodynamic state. Consequently, esketamine could be considered as a potential alternative to sufentanil for sedation during EUS.

Topics & conditions

Detected automatically by Psychedelic Commons from the title and abstract, not labels from the source. They may be incomplete.

KetamineDepression

Keywords

SedationEndoscopic UltrasoundRespiratory DepressionEsketamine

Psychedelic Commons aggregates metadata from open sources and links back to the original. Rights remain with the authors and publishers. Something wrong with this record? Report a problem.